CT-BALI-06 — "Which business is yours?" (HQ vs chapter fork)
Peyton WP tenant · platform.mystflo.com/brain · 2026-08-24 · Verdict: PASS
Proves two fixes shipped 2026-08-23 end-to-end in prod: PR #3920 (the identity-gate
detector now forks on a bare parent/HQ root paste with ≥2 discovered /city-chapters/
siblings — previously this silently absorbed the whole organization) and PR #3923
(the unnamed-arm fallback label reads "The part I run" instead of "This chapter").
Step 1 — Paste the bare HQ root, gate forks
Pasted https://www.theoffline-club.com (no /city-chapters/ path,
no first-person operator copy) into the Brain "Research my business" field on a wiped
Peyton WP tenant. The free peek completes and the identity gate opens with the
conservative unnamed-arm ask — this is the exact case that previously never forked at all.
Title: "We found more than one face on this site — which one is yours?"
Fallback labels: The part I run / The whole business — not the retired
"This chapter". Neither radio is pre-selected. "That's me — run ✦" is disabled (gray).
Step 2 — Pick "The part I run", confirm enables
Radio for "The part I run" selected. Business Name field auto-fills
The Offline Club — the real extracted name, not the literal UI fallback string
(confirms the #2997 placeholder-persistence guard: the fallback label is never
persisted as the confirmed business name). "That's me — run ✦" is now enabled (white).
Subline updates to "Everything we map starts from your pick — nothing from the other
one sneaks in."
Step 3 — Stop (per plan: prove the fork, not a second paid read)
Closed the gate without confirming. This sitting's one paid read was
already spent on the Luma URL in a prior session (CT-BALI-04); CT-BALI-06 only needs
to prove the fork is choosable and HQ is not auto-selected — which it does.
Backend verification (Doppler prd, read-only, user_id-scoped)
| Table | Check | Result |
|---|
brain_profile | business_name | Empty — no row. Confirms nothing was persisted since "That's me" was never tapped. |
brain_read_audit | newest row vs. this walk's timestamp | Newest row predates this walk (from a prior sitting) — no new paid synthesize-profile row fired for theoffline-club.com from this free peek. Matches pass criteria exactly. |
Scope note
This walk targets CT-BALI-06 only — the one scenario gated on the two
fixes above, and the one the queue's own tracking (dated 2026-08-23) marked as
"NOT YET DONE." CT-BALI-00..04 already PASSed in an earlier sitting; CT-BALI-05b remains
BLOCKED on missing fixture screenshots; CT-BALI-07..15 and Sitting B remain outstanding —
those are unrelated to this pair of fixes and are left to whichever session resumes the
full dress rehearsal. The tenant was found already empty (assistants: 0, brain_profile: 0)
when this walk started, despite an earlier same-day queue note describing a completed
CT-BALI-04 paid read — a likely sign of concurrent sessions sharing this one QA tenant.
Flagging for whoever picks this back up, not diagnosing further here.